
It isn't hard to believe that single mom Molly (Marisa Tomei) would join in a drunken singalong of "Don't You Want Me" to bail out John (John C. Reilly) at a party, but it's maybe a little more of a stretch to imagine Molly and John falling for each other. John, whom Riley plays with a winning befuddled quality, is a freelance editor stunned by the impending marriage of his seven years gone ex-wife (Catherine Keener). John and Molly getting together isn't as hard to believe as Cyrus being the first film in which Jonah Hill actually plays a character. Hill is Cyrus, Molly's 21-year old live-in son. Cyrus reveals his true intentions fairly quickly after a couple of benign scenes; this emotionally stunted boy-man wants to bounce John and stay the focus of his mother's attention. The bulk of Cyrus is the dance between John and Cyrus, culminating with an ill-timed brawl that threatens John's budding relationship.
Jonah Hill's comic persona has served him well in Judd Apatow comedies, but the role of Cyrus requires the use of different muscles. Cyrus, who composes blandly serious synth-pop, has been the focus of Molly's attention for over twenty years and isn't ready to give up the spotlight. The idea that Cyrus is the one blind spot for the flinty and self-aware Molly works thanks to Tomei; and I almost hate to say it but Hill's size is right for the role. Cyrus isn't fully formed yet, his immaturity is actually a little scary and Hill hits every note. I wanted to see Cyrus make his last stand against John, but everyone has to be nice to each other at the end and that's where things get fuzzy. Until then Cyrus is a tart pleasure thanks to its cast, despite the fact that it isn't interesting to look at and doesn't ask enough of its female leads (especially Keener). In a summer where big budgets equal blahs, Cyrus is a welcome bass note that uses its cast well.
3 comments:
Really want to like the Dupless Bros. Love the other films, their process. But. This "big-budget" debut is a disappointment. It's like watching three people improvise a play...nothing at all to say or reveal, just a process to observe. When CYRUS is over, I'm left critiquing how well the improv actors listened to each other, explored the space, and found a story. I'm also, just six days after watching this acting exercise, drawing a blank. What happened? What were the filmmakers trying to say or what ideas were they trying to explore? I don't know and frankly, I don't care. Wish they were doing it again next week at a tiny, downtown Chicago improv theater. And I hope they get someone other than the fat kid. He's not nearly as good as that ugly guy and the hot lady.
Chris, the smallness of the film's concerns is a valid complaint....interestingly, I liked this film a little better when I wrote about it than right after I saw it. Anyway, I think we just disagree about Jonah Hill. I liked what he did here and he apparently has SOME range....enough to make this thin broth work for me anyway.
Just re-watched the brilliant chamber trio, YOU CAN COUNT ON ME. Jonah Hill would win Oscars if he had the range of Rory Culkin in that.
I agree he's better in CYRUS than in other films, but I've always thought him the Curly Joe DeRita of contemporary, comical fats.
Post a Comment